CO129-271 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1896 [1-4] — Page 422

2.

use,

examination was not a fiaves, and that the Stead Masters criticions for the most part, wither privolowo unjiwritinol, and valueless.

Head

We do not, in the first place, recognise that the stad Master is mishucked by the Requestions to "com.

mont on the Report made by the Exam.

#

iners to the Governing Body. At the same time we submit that if it has seemed to the thead Mocter desirable to comment on the nature of the papers set, such comments would have

had

weight if they had been they might have been, at the time of the examination, or al latest before the Report appeared.

We have before. I. It letter to the Stonorary Secretory

made, as

no three documents: -

of the Governing Body (4.2.96) II A letter to the Honorary Secretary

of the Governing Body with con- .

papers set (15.2.96)

ments on

II

مجھ کے

A

II. It letter to the Secretary of stude

117/2/90).

420

The Report reached the Slead laster

Zz

February 14).

To these be beg to offer the follow.

ing

Remarks. (The

figures in the

of

the

margin refer to the numbers

paragraphs in the letters under review). (a) The shead Mosher writes that the

report

"The

is not on the work done by

boys but

Be

College.

#

on the

system persued in We maintain that the hoo are very divsily associated; and it is

fact that the report was demone up upon the work done by the bays. Further, the instructions in the Regula.

you say,

"The Examiner or Examiners " shall report in writing

on the profi.

–

"ciency of the scholars and the condition

"

of the college

and discipline

as regards instruction

as shown by

the

exacu

"ination . . We had nothing else besides

the examination

on which to base.

air